JurisRecall
The firm's living memory. Unified search across internal case archive, internal doctrinal notes / memos, and external case law (Doctrine.fr, Lexbase, Légifrance). Results ranked by relevance, mandatory citation provenance, strict per-user ACL enforcement.
Across 100 matters/year/lawyer × 20 lawyers: 2,000-4,000 research hours recovered, ~€500k-1M of time freed. The true differentiator vs. Doctrine.fr: the firm's internal memory, accumulated over 10-20 years.
« Remember that 2019 Supreme Court ruling on excessive non-compete? » - a firm's memory is worth a fortune, exploited at 5%.
Mémoire orale du cabinet
« Tu te souviens de l'arrêt sur la non-concurrence de 2019 ? »
- · 200 dossiers actifs + 2 000 archivés + 5 000 notes internes
- · Recherche dépend de qui se souvient quoi
- · Doctrine.fr / Predictice n'ont QUE la jurisprudence externe
- · Aucun outil n'expose la mémoire interne du cabinet
Recherche unifiée multi-corpus
Dossiers + notes + jurisprudence externe en une requête
- › RAG hybride dossiers internes + ACL strictes (junior ≠ partner)
- › Doctrine.fr / Lexbase / Légifrance / Dalloz selon abonnement
- › Pertinence ★★★★★ → ★ avec citation provenance obligatoire
- › Aucun arrêt inventé, aucune référence dossier hallucinée
Four steps, from incoming document to human decision.
-
1
Lawyer query
A precise legal question: « precedents on a 5-year excessive non-compete clause in a tech SME ». Query logged in the audit chain.
-
2
Parallel multi-corpus search
Agent calls search_dossiers_internes (hybrid RAG + ACL), search_notes_internes (firm doctrinal memos), search_jurisprudence_externe (Doctrine.fr / Lexbase / Légifrance / Dalloz per subscription).
-
3
Strict permission-checking + honest scoring
check_acces for every internal matter before surfacing. Relevance ★★★★★ → ★ based on clause similarity, jurisdiction, counterparty. No score inflation: 3 ★★★★★ results > 20 ★★ results.
-
4
Structured list + related searches
Separate sections Internal precedents / External case law / Doctrinal notes. Mandatory provenance (matter ref + lawyer, jurisdiction + ruling number). Suggested alternative reformulations.
Tools, connectors, deployment.
Tools (function-calling)
4-
search_dossiers_internes -
search_notes_internes -
search_jurisprudence_externe -
check_acces
Optional connectors
4- sharepoint
- doctrine
- lexbase
- legifrance
Each connector activates based on the customer's subscription.
$ lmbox agent deploy ./jurisrecall \
--box BOX-XXX \
--token "$LMBOX_BOX_API_KEY" \
--api https://api.lmbox.ai
LMbox guarantees across the catalogue
Data stays with you
Model and data stay on the customer's LMbox appliance. No patient, contract or invoice data is ever sent to an external cloud.
Audit chain
Every tool call, every agent output is timestamped, hashed and admissible before the regulator (ACPR, ANSM, CNIL, EBA).
Human decision
The agent recommends, the human decides. No auto-signature, no auto-payment: final responsibility stays with the business.
Other catalogue agents
NDA Reviewer
Reads each incoming NDA, identifies non-standard clauses against the firm's internal template library, drafts an amendment memo for the responsible partner.
Meeting Summarizer
Turns a raw meeting transcript (Teams, Zoom, locally-transcribed audio) into a structured CR: decisions made, action items with owner and deadline, open questions.
Try JurisRecall on the public demo.
One-click sign-in. You see the agent installed on a real LMbox, with its system prompt loaded and audit chain live.